The Genetic EpistemologistWinter 1995Volume XXIII, Number 1 |
Back to the Genetic Epistemologist Home Page |
---|
It is difficult to know just what to say. My reflections about the years as president, however powerful for me, seem trite in our age of hard-sell rhetoric where anything is said and feeling comes cheap. It has been an honor to serve as president of the society, to be surrounded by colleagues of such class, to be part of an organization where, as Katherine Nelson recently said to me, "intellectual things happen." When I began translating Piaget in the late seventies, I had no idea that this office would come to me. I only wanted my students to read a few things that were unavailable in English. At the time, I even shied away from JPS, imagining that it must be some sort of cult. It was not until 1987 that my despair over psychiatry's conception of mind in terms of brain and thorazine drove me to my first JPS symposium. I was willing to try anything except antidepressants.
As president, I have presided over many changes, some begun before I arrived, some encouraged by me. Their overall thrust has been to open the society up to a wider audience. In no case has their purpose been to produce converts to Piaget. If there is any doctrine that the society wishes to promote, it is something like: "We are interested in people who think about what knowledge is and where it comes from. If you have similar interests, come and join us." (That, of course, is completely Piagetian.)
Concretely, the society has begun having meetings at different sites, and it has increased efforts to enroll both national and international members. The board is reorganizing in ways that will allow it to operate in much more wide-open fashion, and it is seeking ways to involve members more fully in the workings of the society. We have a fine symposium coming up, and we will be represented in at least three centennial celebrations of Piaget's birth, most notably our own, but not in a retrospective spirit. We want to represent, according to Michael's felicitous metaphor, the cambium layer of Piagetian thought, not the supporting wood.
But enough. I am no good at good-byes. No matter how I cut it, I end up with a list. Michael has written a wonderfully provocative article for this edition of the GE. Your time is better spent reading that and, if you feel the urge, sending commentary on it. This old horse is willingly put out to pasture. But he thanks you for the privilege of being your colleague and your president.
See you in Berkeley,
Terry Brown
The Board of Directors invites you to submit proposals for annual symposia on themes that interest you and that you believe would interest your fellow members. Proposals should include a brief statement of the theme and the reasons that you think that it is important as well as a list of potential plenary speakers. Until a program committee is approved and constituted, proposals should be sent to:
Send comments to: webmaster@piaget.org
Last Update: 21 March 1998
Another horse to pasture
Call for Symposium Proposals
© 1995-1998 The Jean Piaget
Society